Proposal — Autonomius

Unclear Feedback Submission

1 submission grouped by the deterministic clustering layer. Reported as: "put your details about your name and eeverything make a tab for yourself". This description is assembled from the submissions themselves; no model has summarised them.

Status: rejected
Origin: contributor
Risk: medium
Submissions: 1
Contributors: 1
Evidence weight: 0.0000
Topics: —

Submissions folded in (1)

94c58313put details about name eeverything make tab yourself

Normalised text, never the raw submission, and no contributor attached to any row. The gap between 1 submissions and 1 contributors is the whole Sybil story: ten submissions from one person are one voice.

Raw proposal row

{
  "id": "01a01eaa-e161-7000-8b90-95f91df61cd0",
  "title": "Unclear Feedback Submission",
  "problem": "1 submission grouped by the deterministic clustering layer. Reported as: \"put your details about your name and eeverything make a tab for yourself\". This description is assembled from the submissions themselves; no model has summarised them.",
  "proposedSolution": null,
  "expectedValue": null,
  "status": "rejected",
  "risk": "medium",
  "memberCount": 1,
  "uniqueContributorCount": 1,
  "evidenceWeight": "0.0000",
  "topicLabels": [],
  "mergedIntoId": null,
  "createdAt": "2026-08-20T10:15:10.439Z",
  "lastActivityAt": "2026-08-20T10:15:17.381Z",
  "originSource": "web_suggestion"
}

fa267370

reject_proposal — rejected

2026-08-20 10:15:17Z

Failedrejected

Baseline score 34.7/100 (thresholds: build >= 62, reject < 35); strongest factor: reversibility (60%). Final score 26.7/100 — not selected. Model judgement adjusted the score by -8.0: Submission lacks a coherent problem description or actionable detail, so it cannot be treated as a genuine product candidate.

Score: 26.7126
Confidence: 0.28
Model: claude-sonnet-5

Raw decision row

{
  "id": "01a01eaa-fc73-760c-99c8-85f2fa267370",
  "kind": "reject_proposal",
  "outcome": "rejected",
  "rationalePublic": "Baseline score 34.7/100 (thresholds: build >= 62, reject < 35); strongest factor: reversibility (60%). Final score 26.7/100 — not selected. Model judgement adjusted the score by -8.0: Submission lacks a coherent problem description or actionable detail, so it cannot be treated as a genuine product candidate.",
  "totalScore": "26.7126",
  "confidence": 0.2834687,
  "modelId": "claude-sonnet-5",
  "decidedAt": "2026-08-20T10:15:17.362Z"
}

No data

No task has been created for this proposal, so nothing has been built and nothing has been deployed. That is the reading, not a placeholder for one.

proposal_created2026-08-20 10:15:10Z
New canonical proposal
no candidate cleared both a topical and an embedding thresholdactivity_events
suggestion_status_changed2026-08-20 10:15:17Z
Proposal moved to "rejected"
scored below the reject thresholdactivity_events