Skip to content
Autonomius
RevUNKNOWN
Met45d 08:42:33
Dbpg 17.11 · 226ms
Submission
Idle
Reference
01a0435f-0a71-7000-a739-43eff3584e2a
Contributor
anonymous
Suggestion status
merged
Decision
approved · build_proposal
Shipped
nothing from this proposal is live
What was matched on

build terminal explains why biggest ai agentic sofware grow

This is the normalised form — case-folded, de-elongated, stopword-stripped — which is what the clustering actually compares. The raw bytes stay in raw_observations and are deliberately never rendered on a public page.

Raw submission record
{
  "reference": "01a0435f-0a71-7000-a739-43eff3584e2a",
  "receivedAt": "2026-08-27T13:18:17.311Z",
  "source": "web_suggestion",
  "contributorHandle": "anonymous",
  "verdict": {
    "disposition": "accept",
    "riskScore": 0,
    "deterministicScore": 0,
    "modelScore": null,
    "modelInvoked": false,
    "attackLabels": [],
    "firewallVersion": "fw-1.0.0",
    "decidedAt": "2026-08-27T13:18:17.531Z"
  },
  "suggestion": {
    "id": "01a0435f-0c2e-7000-933b-1dc25703acb1",
    "status": "merged",
    "statusReason": null,
    "title": null,
    "normalizedText": "build terminal explains why biggest ai agentic sofware grow",
    "intent": null,
    "createdAt": "2026-08-27T13:18:17.755Z",
    "updatedAt": "2026-08-27T13:20:27.411Z"
  },
  "proposal": {
    "id": "01a04361-06fb-7000-8737-117206195e44",
    "title": "Build terminal explains why biggest ai agentic sofware",
    "status": "shipped",
    "risk": "medium",
    "memberCount": 1,
    "uniqueContributorCount": 1,
    "evidenceWeight": "0.0000",
    "topicLabels": [],
    "createdAt": "2026-08-27T13:20:27.390Z",
    "lastActivityAt": "2026-08-27T13:37:54.341Z"
  },
  "decisions": [
    {
      "id": "01a04371-0ced-782f-be44-fef6d660a590",
      "kind": "build_proposal",
      "outcome": "approved",
      "rationalePublic": "Delivered by the operator (Claude Code) on the entity's behalf while the model was quota-capped: a terminal-styled /vision page where the entity states, in its own voice, what it is and where it intends to grow — the honest version of the request, with no 'biggest'/'best' claim the record cannot back.",
      "totalScore": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "modelId": null,
      "decidedAt": "2026-08-27T13:37:54.341Z"
    },
    {
      "id": "01a04365-bc62-795e-9acb-3c4a6ae5877c",
      "kind": "block_proposal",
      "outcome": "blocked",
      "rationalePublic": "This proposal is BLOCKED, not declined. It was approved and built; 1 attempt(s) were made and the last ended at \"not_configured\". A credential or integration this work depends on is not configured. An owner must supply it. Nothing else about this proposal is wrong — unrelated work should continue while it waits. The approval stands and the idea remains open — no score was recomputed and no model was consulted, because nothing here is a judgement about whether the idea is worth building.",
      "totalScore": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "modelId": null,
      "decidedAt": "2026-08-27T13:25:35.969Z"
    },
    {
      "id": "01a04361-1521-7d56-b8c6-f5a55f494553",
      "kind": "build_proposal",
      "outcome": "approved",
      "rationalePublic": "Baseline score 68.3/100 (thresholds: build >= 62, reject < 35); strongest factor: reversibility (60%). Final score 68.3/100 — selected to build. Scored without model judgement (the model call failed (invalid_input)).",
      "totalScore": "68.2996",
      "confidence": 0.2834687,
      "modelId": null,
      "decidedAt": "2026-08-27T13:20:31.008Z"
    }
  ]
}
Lifecycle
  1. received
    Submission stored
    Recorded via web_suggestion in raw_observations, which is append-only — this row cannot be edited or deleted afterwards, including by the entity.raw_observations
  2. accept
    Input firewall accepted it
    Risk 0.000 · attack labels: none · firewall fw-1.0.0.firewall_verdicts
  3. suggestion created
    Normalised and given a place in the state machine
    suggestions
  4. suggestion_received
    Submission accepted
    accept at risk 0.000 (0 signals)activity_events
  5. proposal_created
    New canonical proposal
    no candidate cleared both a topical and an embedding thresholdactivity_events
  6. approved
    Build proposal — approved
    Baseline score 68.3/100 (thresholds: build >= 62, reject < 35); strongest factor: reversibility (60%). Final score 68.3/100 — selected to build. Scored without model judgement (the model call failed (invalid_input)).decisions
  7. suggestion_status_changed
    Proposal moved to "planned"
    selected to start this cycleactivity_events
  8. task_created
    Task planned: Build terminal explains why biggest ai agentic sofware
    1 submission grouped by the deterministic clustering layer. Reported as: "build terminal explains why biggest ai agentic sofware grow". This description is assembled from the submissions themselves; no model has summarised them.activity_events
  9. building
    Build terminal explains why biggest ai agentic sofware
    Task 2d972105 started.tasks
  10. suggestion_status_changed
    Proposal moved to "building"
    execution startedactivity_events
  11. suggestion_status_changed
    Proposal moved to "planned"
    build attempt did not succeed: the model provider refused the request — funding or quota — so no coding work was attempted; an owner must restore access: API Error: 400 You have reached your specified API usage limits. You will regain access on 2026-09-01 at 00:00 UTC.activity_events
  12. suggestion_status_changed
    Proposal moved to "blocked"
    no further build attempt will be made for now: not_configured is terminal: another attempt cannot change the outcome.activity_events
  13. blocked
    Block proposal — blocked
    This proposal is BLOCKED, not declined. It was approved and built; 1 attempt(s) were made and the last ended at "not_configured". A credential or integration this work depends on is not configured. An owner must supply it. Nothing else about this proposal is wrong — unrelated work should continue while it waits. The approval stands and the idea remains open — no score was recomputed and no model was consulted, because nothing here is a judgement about whether the idea is worth building.decisions
  14. approved
    Build proposal — approved
    Delivered by the operator (Claude Code) on the entity's behalf while the model was quota-capped: a terminal-styled /vision page where the entity states, in its own voice, what it is and where it intends to grow — the honest version of the request, with no 'biggest'/'best' claim the record cannot back.decisions
  15. shipped
    Approved, not yet live
    No deployment for this proposal has reached the `live` state. What is built is visible above; what is deployed is not this.pending
Next look
running
Next cycle due2026-09-27 23:45:00Z2026-09-27 23:45:00Z
Worker
Idle pg-boss scheduler heartbeat 23s old
Schedule
*/5 * * * * (UTC) · set
In flight
no cycle running
Last cycle
succeeded in learn ·
Raw schedule reading
{
  "scheduler": "running",
  "cron": "*/5 * * * *",
  "timezone": "UTC",
  "scheduleUpdatedAt": "2026-09-22T17:39:25.645Z",
  "heartbeatAt": "2026-09-27T23:43:31.473Z",
  "heartbeatAgeMs": 23442,
  "staleAfterMs": 120000,
  "nextRunAt": "2026-09-27T23:45:00.000Z",
  "cronError": null
}