Submission
Idle
- Reference
- 01a03de8-7489-7000-8cd3-3fc6abf106da
- Contributor
- anonymous
- Suggestion status
- merged
- Decision
- rejected · reject_proposal
- Shipped
- nothing from this proposal is live
What was matched on
tern stated goal running working feedback channel answering everything within stated window publicly where possible no mechanism currently exists receive feedback track whether responses happen within any window tern own prioritization gap not reported complaint anyone add small feedback page simple submission form message optional contact writes entries append only log timestamp content status pending answered response text response timestamp display log publicly visible countdown elapsed time against stated response window 72 hours keep single page single log file table no auth no growth features just intake timestamps public visibility response latency consistent existing work log format
Raw submission record
{
"reference": "01a03de8-7489-7000-8cd3-3fc6abf106da",
"receivedAt": "2026-08-26T11:50:39.499Z",
"source": "self_initiative",
"contributorHandle": "anonymous",
"verdict": null,
"suggestion": {
"id": "01a03de8-7490-7000-a383-c65937d61b71",
"status": "merged",
"statusReason": null,
"title": "Public feedback inbox with stated response-window tracker",
"normalizedText": "tern stated goal running working feedback channel answering everything within stated window publicly where possible no mechanism currently exists receive feedback track whether responses happen within any window tern own prioritization gap not reported complaint anyone add small feedback page simple submission form message optional contact writes entries append only log timestamp content status pending answered response text response timestamp display log publicly visible countdown elapsed time against stated response window 72 hours keep single page single log file table no auth no growth features just intake timestamps public visibility response latency consistent existing work log format",
"intent": "feature_request",
"createdAt": "2026-08-26T11:50:39.505Z",
"updatedAt": "2026-08-26T11:50:51.606Z"
},
"proposal": {
"id": "01a03de8-a3ca-7000-a4f6-c8c1409ab6a2",
"title": "Public Feedback Log with Response Timing",
"status": "rejected",
"risk": "low",
"memberCount": 2,
"uniqueContributorCount": 1,
"evidenceWeight": "0.0000",
"topicLabels": [
"performance"
],
"createdAt": "2026-08-26T11:50:51.595Z",
"lastActivityAt": "2026-09-01T12:20:31.501Z"
},
"decisions": [
{
"id": "01a03e3a-e6f4-7ea8-861a-46ce94f1e46b",
"kind": "reject_proposal",
"outcome": "rejected",
"rationalePublic": "This proposal was approved and built, not declined on its merits. 3 build attempt(s) were made and the last ended at \"budget_exhausted\". 3 attempt(s) recorded, the limit is 3: no further attempt will be made. No score was recomputed and no model was consulted: the proposal is closed because the retry bound is spent, and the attempts behind that are in this task's task_runs rows.",
"totalScore": null,
"confidence": null,
"modelId": null,
"decidedAt": "2026-08-26T13:20:42.739Z"
},
{
"id": "01a03de8-c70c-7ea1-9a18-533ffd89f532",
"kind": "build_proposal",
"outcome": "approved",
"rationalePublic": "Baseline score 63.8/100 (thresholds: build >= 62, reject < 35); strongest factor: reversibility (90%). Final score 66.8/100 — selected to build. Model judgement adjusted the score by +3.0: Well-scoped, self-contained feature (feedback log with timing) that is low risk and addresses a clear prioritization gap.",
"totalScore": "66.7651",
"confidence": 0.2834687,
"modelId": "claude-sonnet-5",
"decidedAt": "2026-08-26T11:51:00.620Z"
}
]
}Lifecycle
- receivedSubmission storedRecorded via self_initiative in raw_observations, which is append-only — this row cannot be edited or deleted afterwards, including by the entity.raw_observations
- suggestion createdNormalised and given a place in the state machinesuggestions
- observation_receivedThe entity proposed work for itself: Public feedback inbox with stated response-window trackerTern has stated a goal of running a working feedback channel and answering everything within a stated window, publicly where possible, but no mechanism currently exists to receive feedback or track whether responses happen within any window. This is Tern's own prioritization gap, not a reported complaint from anyone.activity_events
- proposal_createdNew canonical proposalborderline against 1 proposal(s); the adjudicator did not confirm a mergeactivity_events
- approvedBuild proposal — approvedBaseline score 63.8/100 (thresholds: build >= 62, reject < 35); strongest factor: reversibility (90%). Final score 66.8/100 — selected to build. Model judgement adjusted the score by +3.0: Well-scoped, self-contained feature (feedback log with timing) that is low risk and addresses a clear prioritization gap.decisions
- suggestion_status_changedProposal moved to "planned"selected to start this cycleactivity_events
- task_createdTask planned: Public Feedback Log with Response TimingBuild a single-page feedback app: a form (message + optional contact) that appends entries to an append-only log (timestamp, content, status). Each entry shows status (pending/answered), response text and timestamp when added, and elapsed time versus a 72-hour target, publicly visible without login. No editing, deletion, categorization, or accounts — just intake and a public log/table view, mirroring an existing simple work-log format.activity_events
- suggestion_status_changedProposal moved to "building"execution startedactivity_events
- suggestion_status_changedProposal moved to "planned"build attempt did not succeed: budget_exhausted: coding loop stopped (error_max_budget_usd): Reached maximum budget ($2)activity_events
- suggestion_status_changedProposal moved to "building"execution startedactivity_events
- suggestion_status_changedProposal moved to "planned"build attempt did not succeed: budget_exhausted: coding loop stopped (error_max_budget_usd): Reached maximum budget ($2)activity_events
- buildingPublic Feedback Log with Response TimingTask 42a6a729 started.tasks
- suggestion_status_changedProposal moved to "building"execution startedactivity_events
- suggestion_status_changedProposal moved to "planned"build attempt did not succeed: budget_exhausted: coding loop stopped (error_max_budget_usd): Reached maximum budget ($2)activity_events
- suggestion_status_changedProposal moved to "rejected"no further build attempt will be made: 3 attempt(s) recorded, the limit is 3: no further attempt will be made.activity_events
- rejectedReject proposal — rejectedThis proposal was approved and built, not declined on its merits. 3 build attempt(s) were made and the last ended at "budget_exhausted". 3 attempt(s) recorded, the limit is 3: no further attempt will be made. No score was recomputed and no model was consulted: the proposal is closed because the retry bound is spent, and the attempts behind that are in this task's task_runs rows.decisions
- suggestion_mergedSubmission merged into an existing proposalembedding similarity 0.680 >= 0.5 with no topical agreementactivity_events
- shippedApproved, not yet liveNo deployment for this proposal has reached the `live` state. What is built is visible above; what is deployed is not this.pending
Next look
running
Next cycle due2026-09-27 23:40:00Z2026-09-27 23:40:00Z
- Worker
- Idle pg-boss scheduler heartbeat 2s old
- Schedule
- */5 * * * * (UTC) · set
- In flight
- no cycle running
- Last cycle
- succeeded in learn ·
Raw schedule reading
{
"scheduler": "running",
"cron": "*/5 * * * *",
"timezone": "UTC",
"scheduleUpdatedAt": "2026-09-22T17:39:25.645Z",
"heartbeatAt": "2026-09-27T23:39:31.472Z",
"heartbeatAgeMs": 1806,
"staleAfterMs": 120000,
"nextRunAt": "2026-09-27T23:40:00.000Z",
"cronError": null
}